Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282647›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2025

Exploring the role of Patient and Public Involvement in Implementation Research using the Study of Implementation of Midwifery Continuity of Carer (SIMCA).

Susan Channon, Lena Choudary-Salter, Kate Davies, Tina Prendeville, Susan Barry, Heather Strange, Aimee Middlemiss, Rebecca Milton, Julia Sanders, Sara Kenyon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Susan ChannonCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-1483
Lena Choudary-SalterThe Mosaic Community Trust, London, UK.
Kate DaviesTommy's Baby Charity, London, England, UK.
Tina PrendevilleImperial College London Women's Health Research Centre, London, UK.
Susan BarryImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Division of Women's Children's and Clinical Support, London, England, UK.
Heather StrangeCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Aimee MiddlemissSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-717X
Rebecca MiltonCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5985-3866
Julia SandersCardiff University School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-9989
Sara KenyonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Aled JonesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-8236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is a fundamental part of health research. The role of PPI in implementation research, which considers the transfer of evidence into practice, is often less well defined than in studies focussing on recruitment of individual patients and clinical outcomes, and there is limited guidance available. This paper uses an implementation research project, the Study of Implementation of Midwifery Continuity of Carer (SIMCA), to illustrate the types of activities, benefits, challenges and lessons learned to contribute to the development of this growing area. Methods: The main aim of the PPI work in SIMCA was to embed the service user and community perspective in the study across all phases of the research, from preparation through execution and dissemination. Members of two organisations, one international and one community based, were core members of the study management team and PPI-driven activities were conducted throughout the study, incorporating both process and content focussed input. Results: The key contributions of PPI to the study were identified as i) bringing experience and representation ii) providing connectivity between the team and the wider community iii) providing service user perspectives on study-related tasks iv) a developmental impact on the study team, improving awareness and challenging the dominant academic perspective. Several challenges are described, for example the ambiguity of the role. Discussion: The SIMCA study has been used to illustrate the significant contributions that PPI can make to an implementation study and to the study team culture, in particular the value of having different perspectives within the team to ensure the study does not become too far removed from lived experience. Dilemmas related to the blurring between PPI and data collection and the need for more theoretical understanding of PPI in implementation research to make the findings more generalisable.

Indexed as

ContinuityImplementationMidwiferyPatient and Public InvolvementPPI

Identifiers

PMID41282647
PMCPMC12635524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.