ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Identifying gastric intestinal metaplasia risk based on clinical indicators: a machine learning predictive model based on the SHAP methodology.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for StagingJournal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Autoimmune gastritis: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Screening for gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) holds significant importance for the early detection of gastric cancer. To help clinicians identify high-risk GIM patients and determine the timing of gastric mucosal biopsy, we aim to develop a predictive model for the occurrence of GIM in patients. Methods: Patients were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Initially, the VarSelRF algorithm identified independent variables linked to GIM development. We employed eight machine learning algorithms, including Decision Trees (DT), Elastic Net (ENet), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), LightGBM, Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) to construct predictive models. Their performances were benchmarked using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. We also applied SHAP values to interpret the RF model, quantifying the contribution of each feature to predictions. Additionally, a web-based calculator was developed based on the RF model to facilitate practical clinical applications. Results: Among the 975 patients examined, 322 individuals were pathologically confirmed to have GIM. Eleven independent variables significantly contributed to GIM occurrence, including gastric mucosal atrophy, Conclusion: This study highlights the innovative use of serological biomarkers to assess the risk of GIM. We found that certain markers related to liver and kidney function are strong predictors of GIM development. Additionally, the application of SHAP values improves the understanding of how features contribute to predictions, while the newly developed web-based calculator offers a practical tool for clinicians to evaluate GIM risk more easily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.