ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Prediction and quality evaluation of quality markers of
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: The aim of this study was to identify the Q-markers of GSB that define its therapeutic efficacy against liver injury. This was achieved through establishing HPLC fingerprints and conducting "small molecule-protein" interaction screening, followed by verification using Results: First, the HPLC fingerprints of 44 batches of GSB from differentproducing areas were established, revealing 25 common peaks. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) of the 25 peak areas resulted in the identification of five components based on Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) values >1. Subsequently, these small-molecule components of GSB were screened for interaction with liver proteins, leading to the identification of three components with strong efficacy, namely, swertiamarin, gentiopicroside, and sweroside, which were designated as Q-markers of GSB associated with liver injury treatment. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy of these Q-markers was validated using a hydrogen peroxide-induced NCTC 1469 cell injury model. Finally, the Q-markers were quantified, and the quality of GSB samples from different origins was evaluated through PCA, entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) based on the quantification results. Discussion: The potential Q-markers of GSB were predicted through the integration of HPLC fingerprinting, pattern recognition, and small molecule-protein interaction analysis. Cell experiment results showed that swertiamarin, gentiopicroside, and sweroside significantly alleviated liver cell injury. Quantitative analysis of the Q-markers identified significant differences in their contents across GSB samples from different producing areas. This methodology provides a novel and comprehensive framework for defining Q-markers and evaluating GSB quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.