ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Development of a venous thromboembolism risk prediction model for patients with primary membranous nephropathy based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study utilizes real-world data from primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) patients to preliminarily develop a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk prediction model with machine learning. The aim is to improve the rational use of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy by predicting VTE risk in these patients. Methods: We collected diagnostic and treatment data for PMN patients hospitalized at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from 1 January 2018, to 30 September 2024. The data was divided into training and test sets at an 8:2 ratio, followed by processed using combinations of three imputation methods, three sampling methods, and three feature selection methods. After preprocessing, fourteen machine learning algorithms were employed to develop a predictive model for VTE risk in PMN patients. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the contribution of outcome features. Finally, a VTE risk prediction tool for PMN patients was constructed using Streamlit. Results: A total of 643 patients with PMN were included in the study, of whom 93 developed VTE. Among the 504 models constructed, the NGBoost model, which incorporated imputation by K-Nearest Neighbor, sampling by Borderline-SMOTE, and feature selection by Frequency-based Selection, was identified as the optimal model, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.911. The optimal model included ten features: D-dimer (DD), Fibrin Degradation Products (FDP)>5 mg/L, international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin, Recurrent nephrotic syndrome (RNS), cholinesterase (CHE), Urinary Microalbumin to Creatinine Ratio (umALB/Ucr), statins, antithrombin III (AT III) activity, albumin, and anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody (aPLA2Rab). Finally, an online predictive tool based on the optimal model was developed to provide real-time individualized VTE risk predictions for PMN patients. Conclusion: This study developed a personalized risk prediction model for VTE in PMN patients using machine learning techniques. Additionally, a web-based tool for this predictive model was created. The model demonstrates strong predictive performance and can assist in clinical decision-making for the prevention and treatment of VTE in PMN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.