ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
A Comprehensive Approach to Responsible AI Development and Deployment.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lifecycle governance and learning health system framework for trustworthy, generalizable, and sustainable human-ai partnership in clinical practice: Lessons from the asthma-guidance and prediction system (A-GPS).Journal of the National Medical Association · 2026Review
- From Agents to Governance: Essential AI Skills for Clinicians in the Large Language Model Era.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into health care offers the potential to address critical challenges related to access to care, workforce burnout, and health inequities. Despite its promise, AI adoption remains limited due to safety, efficacy, and equity concerns. This paper presents a novel and comprehensive framework for responsible AI development, evaluation, and deployment in health care, encompassing four key phases: (1) AI Solution Design and Development, (2) AI Solution Qualification, (3) AI Solution Efficacy and Safety Evaluation, and (4) AI Solution Impact. By establishing rigorous standards for operational, clinical, and technical quality, the framework aims to guide AI developers and health care professionals toward creating AI solutions that are ethical, effective, and scalable. This structured approach fosters collaboration and mitigates risks to help AI achieve its full potential in improving patient outcomes and health care efficiency.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.