ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Biomechanical comparison of different bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: finite element analysis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty using robot-assisted cross-puncture technique for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the biomechanical effects of two bone cement injection techniques by establishing a finite element model of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods: CT data from a healthy male volunteer were used to construct a three-dimensional finite element model of the L1-L3 vertebrae. A simulated vertebral compression fracture was created at L2, followed by virtual vertebroplasty using two cement distribution patterns: the vertical group (VG) and the inclined group (IG). Stress distribution, maximum von Mises stress in the vertebrae and intervertebral discs, and the maximum displacement of L2 were compared between the two groups. Results: In the L2 vertebra, the maximum stress in the VG is reduced under all six loading conditions. VG showed reduced maximum stress in the L1 vertebra during extension, left bending, and left/right rotation. For the L3 vertebra, VG achieved the lowest maximum stress under all loading conditions. In the L1-L2 intervertebral disc, VG resulted in lower maximum stress than IG during flexion, extension, and lateral bending. while in the L2-L3 disc, VG produced the lowest maximum stress under all six conditions. Furthermore, under flexion and extension, the maximum displacement of L2 was smaller in VG compared with IG. Conclusions: The vertical cement distribution pattern effectively reduces vertebral and intervertebral disc stress and provides greater stability of the fractured vertebra compared with the inclined distribution pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.