Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282556›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Biomechanical comparison of different bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: finite element analysis.

Weihua Yang, Jing Chen, Bei Lin, Eryou Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weihua Yang *Department of Arthrosis Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jing Chen *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Anxi County Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
Bei LinDepartment of Arthrosis Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Eryou FengDepartment of Arthrosis Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the biomechanical effects of two bone cement injection techniques by establishing a finite element model of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods: CT data from a healthy male volunteer were used to construct a three-dimensional finite element model of the L1-L3 vertebrae. A simulated vertebral compression fracture was created at L2, followed by virtual vertebroplasty using two cement distribution patterns: the vertical group (VG) and the inclined group (IG). Stress distribution, maximum von Mises stress in the vertebrae and intervertebral discs, and the maximum displacement of L2 were compared between the two groups. Results: In the L2 vertebra, the maximum stress in the VG is reduced under all six loading conditions. VG showed reduced maximum stress in the L1 vertebra during extension, left bending, and left/right rotation. For the L3 vertebra, VG achieved the lowest maximum stress under all loading conditions. In the L1-L2 intervertebral disc, VG resulted in lower maximum stress than IG during flexion, extension, and lateral bending. while in the L2-L3 disc, VG produced the lowest maximum stress under all six conditions. Furthermore, under flexion and extension, the maximum displacement of L2 was smaller in VG compared with IG. Conclusions: The vertical cement distribution pattern effectively reduces vertebral and intervertebral disc stress and provides greater stability of the fractured vertebra compared with the inclined distribution pattern.

Indexed as

bone cement distributionfinite element analysisosteoporosisvertebral compression fracturevertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41282556
PMCPMC12631213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.