ArticleGastroenterology report2025
Chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus targeted therapy as adjuvant therapy for initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is no consensus on the adjuvant treatment regimen for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) who have achieved successful conversion after surgery. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy alone (CA) versus chemotherapy plus targeted therapy (CT) as adjuvant therapy for CRLM patients. Methods: Initially unresectable CRLM patients who were converted to hepatectomy with no evidence of disease between June 2013 and June 2020 were retrospectively analysed. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the CA and CT cohorts by using 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). After PSM, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. A comprehensive subgroup analysis compared the efficacy between the cohorts, with DFS and OS assessed by using a stratified log-rank test and summarized by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. Results: After PSM, 66 CA and 132 CT patients were included. DFS and OS were similar between the CA and CT cohorts (median DFS: 8.5 vs 10.8 months; median OS: 51.7 vs 56.5 months; both Conclusion: CT, as adjuvant therapy, effectively reduced intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrence in initially unresectable CRLM patients. The patients with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.