Relative efficacy of tafamidis, acoramidis, patisiran and vutrisiran in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a network meta-analysis.

Aims: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is an important cause of heart failure (HF). Several therapies demonstrated an efficacy in reducing hard and surrogate endpoints. We compared the relative efficacy of therapies evaluated in completed phase III trials. Methods and results: We conducted a network meta-analysis using data from ATTR-ACT, ATTRIBUTE-CM, APOLLO-B, and HELIOS-B. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Secondary endpoints were changes in the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) scores. For the primary endpoint, tafamidis and vutrisiran demonstrated a significant survival benefit over placebo; acoramidis approached significance. In indirect comparisons, there was no clear evidence of a larger absolute risk reduction for any drug. Tafamidis was associated with the lowest risk for the primary endpoint (surface under the cumulative ranking, SUCRA 82%), followed by vutrisiran monotherapy (70%). Regarding changes in 6MWD, tafamidis and acoramidis had the highest SUCRA curve values (97% and 69%, respectively). For KCCQ-OS changes, tafamidis also had the highest SUCRA (87%), followed by acoramidis (79%) and vutrisiran monotherapy (67%). When the ATTR-ACT trial was excluded from the analysis, vutrisiran monotherapy consistently showed the highest probability of being ranked better than other treatments in terms of primary end-point. Conclusion: Although differences in trial design and study populations complicate direct efficacy comparisons, tafamidis demonstrated the highest efficacy in improving survival, reducing cardiovascular hospitalizations, and enhancing functional capacity and quality of life in patients with ATTR-CA, but also vutrisiran and acoramidis emerged as viable options.