ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2025
Integrating graph convolutional networks with large language models for structured biomedical material knowledge representation.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated literature mining is key to building structured biomedical materials databases, yet current methods struggle with large publication volumes, complex entity relations and domain-specific terminology. We propose a hierarchical natural language processing (NLP) framework for extracting structured data from biomedical materials texts. Our pipeline uses named entity recognition (NER) to identify entities such as compositions, synthesis methods and properties. Sentence-level relation extraction captures direct associations (e.g. temperature, morphology), while a paragraph-level graph convolutional network (GCN) module resolves cross-sentence co-references. Rule-based templates enhance precision in specific cases. Extracted relations are integrated into a biomedical materials knowledge graph, enabling scalable and extensible data representation. Experiments show that the sentence-level model achieves 84.7% accuracy and the GCN-based module achieves 84.0%. This approach offers an efficient pipeline for structuring complex scientific texts, reducing manual effort and supporting large-scale knowledge extraction in biomedical materials and related domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.