ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Impact of oil and gas boom and busts on working-age mortality in the U.S.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Residential proximity to oil and gas development and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The oil and gas sector is prone to boom-and-bust cycles that create precarious employment conditions, social disruptions, and environmental stressors, which could impact working-age mortality (i.e., premature death between 25 and 64 years old). Methods: We evaluated the association between booms and busts from oil and gas development with respect to working-age mortality. Using integrated county-level oil and gas production data with mortality records (2000-2011), we implemented a two-way fixed effects spatial lag of X (i.e., SLX) Poisson regression model, accounting for county-specific trends. We also estimated a distributed lag model to test for long-run effects after the initial shock. Results: We find stronger evidence that busts, rather than booms, in oil and gas production are associated with increases in all-cause working-age mortality. The average production bust yielded 0.4 additional deaths per county (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1, 0.6). While rarer, extreme production busts were associated with as many as 19.5 additional deaths per county (95% CI: 6.7, 32.3). These findings suggest that an average, country-wide oil and gas bust event would result in 439 additional working age deaths across the U.S. (95% CI: 165, 714). In the cause-specific analyses, more complex associations emerge regarding the influence of the boom and the bust exposures on working-age mortality, including substantial variation in effect magnitude and directionality by specific causes. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the complexity in the association between boom-and-bust cycles with respect to working-age mortality in the U.S., providing many avenues for future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.