ReviewRegenerative therapy2025
Mesenchymal stem cells in neurological disorders: Insights from clinical trials.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Stem Cells in Post-Stroke Regenerative Therapy: Current Role of Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Orchestrum.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- The Evolving Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Exosomes in Epilepsy Management: From Bench to Bedside.Stem cells international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit unique properties that make them promising candidates for cell therapy, particularly in neurological disorders. They can be derived from various tissues, with bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and placenta being the most common sources. Evidence suggests that the tissue of origin significantly influences MSC characteristics, including secretome composition, proliferation rate, and adhesion capacity. Clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and therapeutic potential of MSCs in conditions such as spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and stroke. MSC therapy has been associated with improvements in motor, sensory, and cognitive functions, as well as enhanced quality of life. Mechanistically, MSCs promote neuroprotection, reduce inflammation, and modulate immune responses. In spinal cord injury, intrathecal administration of adipose- and bone marrow-derived MSCs has led to significant functional recovery, with single high-dose treatments often yielding better outcomes than multiple lower doses. In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, bone marrow-derived MSCs have shown potential in slowing disease progression, though higher doses do not always result in greater benefits. In multiple sclerosis, high doses of umbilical cord-derived MSCs improved quality of life and prevented disease progression, whereas lower doses of bone marrow-derived MSCs provided limited functional benefits. While MSC therapy is considered safe, patient responses vary, and a definitive correlation between administered dose and therapeutic effects remains elusive. The small number of studies using comparable protocols impedes comparison of other relevant factor, limits the drawing of conclusions and underscore the importance of developing standardized protocols to optimize MSC-based treatments and maximize their clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.