ReviewRegenerative therapy2025
The Platelet-Rich Plasma research ecosystem: From mechanistic insights to precision treatment in knee osteoarthritis.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Precision Orthobiologics in Musculoskeletal Conditions.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Review
- Immuno-based profiling of knee osteoarthritis patients identifies baseline characteristics associated with positive response to autologous platelet-rich plasma injection at one-year follow-up.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and big data for precision regenerative medicine in knee osteoarthritis: endotyping, responder prediction, and clinical translation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Preparing the soil in knee osteoarthritis: a seed-systemic soil-local tissue soil framework for orthobiologic response heterogeneity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is now one of the most widely used orthobiologics in musculoskeletal medicine, with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) as its main indication. PRP represents a spectrum of autologous preparations with differing cellular and protein content. In this narrative review, we frame current knowledge as a "research ecosystem" spanning mechanistic biology, product characterization, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, methodological evaluations, expert consensus, and precision medicine. We highlight the diverse biological roles of PRP components, including the immunomodulatory activity of platelets, the dual regenerative and inflammatory effects of leukocytes, and emerging neutrophil-macrophage crosstalk. Advances in classification systems and deep learning-based quality control are also discussed. Across RCTs, PRP generally outperforms corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid in early to moderate KOA, with benefits lasting several months to a year. Methodological evaluation adds nuance: fragility index analysis confirmed PRP's advantage but showed individual trials were only modestly robust, while spin in systematic reviews often overstated benefits, underscoring the need for more rigorous RCTs and transparent reporting. Leukocyte and platelet concentrations do not explain outcomes, highlighting the importance of patient-specific factors such as metabolic status, inflammation, and structural phenotype. Progress remains hampered by inconsistent reporting, lack of a standardized classification system, and inadequate stratification. We propose a roadmap linking product characterization, standardized reporting, precision patient selection, and objective outcome measures, aiming to shift PRP from a generic injection toward a tailored regenerative therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.