Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282488›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience insights2025

Investigating Prospective Memory Processes: ERP Evidence from Novel Semantic Judgment Tasks.

Eliza Baby, Shraddha A Shende, Sally Grace Rogers, Natalia Rzepa, Raksha A Mudar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eliza BabyCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7797-9070
Shraddha A ShendeDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Illinois State University, Normal, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9844-7078
Sally Grace RogersCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9927-960X
Natalia RzepaCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2957-1462
Raksha A MudarCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0170-0554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM), the ability to plan and execute intentions in the future, plays a critical role in managing everyday tasks. A gap exists in our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying PM retrieval based on semantic judgment, particularly when using picture-based stimuli. The current study tested 2 novel picture-based semantic-judgment PM tasks: Animal-cued Prospective Retrieval Task (Ac-PRT) and Object-cued Prospective Retrieval Task (Oc-PRT), designed to investigate PM processes involved in intention formation (Cue trials), intention retention (Ongoing trials), and intention retrieval (PM Retrieval trials). Twenty-three young adults, aged 18 to 30 years, completed the tasks while EEG data were recorded. Behavioral results showed that participants responded more slowly during Ongoing trials compared to Cue and PM Retrieval trials and were less accurate during PM Retrieval trials. Additionally, between the tasks, responses were faster and more accurate in Ac-PRT than in Oc-PRT during both Ongoing and PM Retrieval trials. ERP analyses revealed distinct neural signatures across trial types, particularly in P2, N2, N4, and Parietal Positivity (PP) components in both tasks. Additionally, task-specific differences were observed during the PM Retrieval trials in P2, N4, and PP amplitudes and in PP amplitude during the Ongoing trials. These findings demonstrate that the 2 tasks effectively dissociated core PM processes and showed category-specific differences in behavioral and neural mechanisms, offering a robust framework for future investigations of PM in aging and clinical populations.

Indexed as

cognitionelectrophysiologyERPevent-related potentialsfuture intentionsprospective memorysemantic judgmentyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID41282488
PMCPMC12639234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.