ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Novel Needle for Intravitreal Injections Does Not Affect Biological Activity of Anti-VEGF Drugs.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In this in vitro study, we investigated if the biological activity of commonly used VEGF antagonists might be affected by their passage through a newly designed 30 G needle (NDN) for intravitreal injection (IVI). To reduce the risk of intraocular inflammation compared to conventional injection with a standard hypodermic 30 G needle (SHN), the NDN contains an occluded front orifice and a side port for drug delivery, resulting in an altered direction of the injection stream. Methods: Anti-VEGF drugs, such as ranibizumab, faricimab, and aflibercept, were passed twice through one of the two needle types to imitate IVI. To evaluate the VEGF-A-binding capacity of the un- or pretreated antagonists, VEGF-A Results: Only a marginal amount of free VEGF-A, if any, was detected after incubation of the growth factor with a fourfold molar excess of any of the antagonists, independent of the drugs' pretreatment. VEGF-A Conclusion: The passage of the proteins through NDN or SHN did neither affect efficient binding to their target, nor their capacity to prevent VEGF-A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.