Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282457›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2025

Classification of Odor-Derived Electroantennograms with Machine Learning.

Joshua Swore, Melanie Anderson, Marissa Dominguez, Tom Daniel, Jeff Riffell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua SworeDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Melanie AndersonDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-6857
Marissa DominguezDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Tom DanielDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Jeff RiffellDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects have a keen ability to detect numerous odors in their environment. These odors, known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), provide the insect with information about food, predators, and mates that may be in the area and are detected by olfactory receptors expressed by sensory neurons on the antennae. When VOCs are transduced by the olfactory sensory neurons, the antennal electrical potential dynamically changes, causing a local field potential (LFP) response to occur. Research has used the LFP amplitude for determining VOC concentration, but only recently have antennal LFPs been posited to be able to be used for VOC discrimination and identification. To close this gap, we use the time-series response of the antenna to odors as well as principal components of these responses to capture the characteristics of the LFP response, including waveform dynamics, intensity, slope, and duration. We use antennae of the

Identifiers

PMID41282457
PMCPMC12631027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.