ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Hyaluronic Acid Gluteal Augmentation: New Marking and Application Technique.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current practices in gluteal augmentation with hyaluronic acid (HA) lack standardization. In this study, we propose a novel technique for volume assessment, marking, and the application of HA gluteal augmentation, focusing on achieving optimal results with minimal injection volume. Methods: Twenty-six women received HA injections guided by markings based on anatomical landmarks and desired aesthetics. A laser level and specific points were used to define an ovoid-shaped base with 3 key areas (areas I, II, and III) for targeted HA distribution. A maximum volume of 100 mL (average 40.4 mL) was used for each patient. Results: Hip circumference increased slightly after treatment. Immediately after HA application, the average increases in hip circumference at and 2 cm above the symphysis pubis level were 1.1 and 2.2 cm, respectively. Danilla D point increased by 1.7 cm immediately and by 2.6 cm at 1 month posttreatment. These changes were statistically significant (hip circumference: χ² = 51.1, Conclusions: This standardized marking and application technique addressed the limited HA volume by strategically targeting specific gluteal regions. This approach aims to achieve optimal buttock augmentation with minimal complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.