ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Managing Drainless Mastectomy With Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Using Full-coverage Foam Dressings.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical and economic impact of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in breast surgery: meta-analysis.The British journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the United Kingdom, the rise in simple mastectomies without drain placement has contributed to improving rates of day-case surgery. However, this practice has resulted in increased rates of symptomatic seromas and greater resource burden in clinics. For postoperative incision management, we have implemented the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) with foam dressings that cover the entire incision and surrounding tissues. The aim of this study was to establish whether the use of full-coverage ciNPT after mastectomy reduced seroma-related interventions. Methods: Seroma intervention data were collected for patients undergoing mastectomies at a single center. Thirty sequential patients with conventional dressings placed between December 2020 and May 2021 and 25 sequential patients with ciNPT with full-coverage dressings between August 2021 and January 2022 were included in the study. Results: There were 31 mastectomy cases in each arm (including bilateral cases). Twenty cases in the control group and 15 cases in the ciNPT group required a return to the clinic for seroma. In the control group, 16 incisions required at least 1 aspiration, versus 12 in the ciNPT group. Compared with the control group, the ciNPT group required fewer aspirations per mastectomy ( Conclusions: In our clinic, nearly two-thirds of drainless mastectomy patients required postoperative visits for seromas. Patients managed with ciNPT dressings covering the entire breast required fewer seroma-related visits and experienced reduced total seroma volume.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.