ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Effectiveness of Discharge Planning Interventions for Stroke and Heart Conditions: A Systematic Review of Interventional Studies.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient experience and stroke care quality: a quality improvement initiative in Northeastern Ontario.BMJ open quality · 2026Observational
- Discharge Learning Needs and Associated Factors Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Observational
- Digital education for cardiac care readiness among coronary heart disease patients in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Global cardiology science & practice · 2026Review
- Review
- Nurse-Led Identification of Financial Toxicity in Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning: Development and Validation of an Associational Prediction Model.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of discharge planning interventions in improving health outcomes among individuals with stroke and heart conditions, synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, seven electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science, Ovid, and ClinicalKey Nursing) were searched for studies published between 2019 and 2024. Eligible studies included adults with stroke or heart conditions who received discharge planning interventions, with outcomes compared to usual care or alternative interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-I for quasi-experimental studies. Data were extracted with a standardized chart and synthesized using a convergent integrated approach in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Results: Sixteen studies (11 randomized controlled trials and 5 quasi-experimental studies) met the inclusion criteria, representing diverse populations across 11 countries. Interventions included structured discharge programs, early supported discharge, interdisciplinary planning, family-based care, nurse-led eHealth rehabilitation, and technology-enhanced approaches such as SMS, telephone, and interactive voice response systems. Six major outcome themes emerged: (1) healthcare utilization and cost outcomes, (2) patient activation and health behavior change, (3) psychological well-being, (4) functional recovery, (5) health-related quality of life, and (6) caregiver outcomes and support. Although mortality and long-term outcomes showed mixed results, most interventions demonstrated positive short-term effects across clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial domains. Conclusion: Discharge planning interventions improve transitional care and support recovery in stroke and heart disease populations, with particular benefits when multidisciplinary, nurse-led, or digitally supported. This review highlights the value of structured and innovative discharge planning models for clinical practice. Incorporating patient- and caregiver-centered strategies can reduce readmissions, strengthen adherence, and improve long-term health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.