ArticleJournal of pain research2025
"The Fact [Is] That There Is No Easy Way". A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Aotearoa New Zealand Clinicians with Opioid Tapering for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Opioid tapering is a complex process for both clinicians and patients with chronic pain. This qualitative study explored the experiences of Aotearoa New Zealand clinicians in managing opioids for patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Methods: Purposive and snowball sampling were used to interview nineteen health professionals including general practitioners (n=5), pain medicine specialists (n=5), addiction medicine specialists (n=4), pain fellows (n=3), addiction medicine registrar (n=1) and a pain nurse practitioner (n=1). Data were collected using a face-to-face focus group and fourteen individual interviews conducted via Zoom. The data were analysed using a Reflexive Thematic Analysis approach. Independent parallel coding was done by members of our research team, and the final themes were iteratively developed by mutual consensus. Results: This qualitative study suggests that meaningful opioid tapering requires a patient-centred approach that considers the individual's unique sociopsychobiomedical context. Clinicians emphasised the importance of building trust, addressing fears, and tailoring tapering regimens to patients' needs and motivations. While opioid tapering is a complex process for all patients, participants acknowledged unique considerations for supporting people living in rural areas - Māori and Pasifika and their whānau (families and significant others) addressing social determinants of health. There were overwhelming accounts of clinician distress from all participants especially for rural general practitioners due to the lack of support, conflicting practices, limited resourcing, and time constraints. Conclusion: These findings call for a co-ordinated, multidisciplinary approach to opioid tapering that addresses systemic inequities and prioritises patient and clinician well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.