ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2025
Ginsenoside CK potentiates SIRT1 to alleviate lupus nephritis through compensating for XBP1-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress in plasma cells.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-targeted liposomes delivering ginsenoside CK attenuate cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing PANoptosis via O-GlcNAcylation of RIPK1/RIPK3.Journal of ginseng research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune complex deposition is a critical factor in early renal damage associated with lupus nephritis (LN), and targeting plasma cell aggregation offers a promising therapeutic strategy. Ginsenoside compound K (i.e., 20-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.