ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Diversity Patterns and Ecological Network Features of Soil Mite Trophic Groups in Karst Cave Ecosystems.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diversity Patterns and Ecological Network Features of Soil Mite Trophic Groups in Karst Cave Ecosystems.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trophic niche differentiation alleviates interspecific competition among soil fauna by modulating resource utilization and allocation, offering a novel perspective for understanding biodiversity maintenance and species coexistence in subterranean ecosystems. As a typical example of an oligotrophic and extremely dark environment, karst cave soils support arthropod communities that are functionally distinct from those in surface habitats. However, systematic understanding of the multidimensional diversity patterns and ecological network complexity of multitrophic groups of cave-dwelling soil mites remains limited. In this study, soil mite samples were collected from distinct photic zones of the cave including the dark, twilight, light, and entrance zones. We aimed to uncover the variation in α, β, and functional diversity among multitrophic groups (including predators and decomposers), and constructed ecological networks to examine patterns of biotic interactions and species coexistence. The results showed that along the cave environmental gradient, the α-diversity of different trophic groups increased, while functional diversity exhibited a contrasting trend. In addition, except for predator groups, the β-diversity of soil mites did not differ significantly among cave microhabitats and was primarily driven by species replacement processes. Moreover, the complexity of ecological networks progressively increased along the cave gradient, indicating that interactions among multitrophic groups intensified, with predatory mites playing a central role in maintaining network stability. Notably, no indicator species were found in the dark zone, which represents the core oligotrophic habitat within caves. Our study demonstrates that, compared to surface habitats such as cave entrances and adjacent agricultural lands, cave soil environments support simpler community composition, diversity, and ecological network complexity across different trophic groups of mites. Furthermore, predatory mites not only serve as keystone taxa within cave habitats, but also play a pivotal role in mediating interactions among trophic groups. These findings provide important theoretical insights for understanding community assembly processes under extreme environmental conditions, maintaining ecosystem stability, and supporting the conservation of subterranean biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.