ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Evaluating physicochemical, nutritional and sensory properties of plant-based surimi: A focus on protein source.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focuses on the development and characterization of plant-based surimi formulations incorporating soy, pea, and mung bean protein isolates. Seven formulations were evaluated for their physicochemical, rheological, thermal, sensory, and nutritional properties to determine their potential as alternatives to traditional fish-based surimi. Among the tested formulations, the sample prepared with pea protein isolate exhibited textural attributes most comparable to conventional surimi, which was supported by scanning electron microscopy revealing a dense and continuous protein matrix. The pea protein-based surimi also demonstrated the highest whiteness index. Sensory evaluation further indicated a preference for the pea-based formulation, particularly in terms of texture and overall acceptability. Although the protein content of the plant-based surimi was lower than that of conventional surimi, the plant-based blend outperformed in fat and ash contents. These results underscore the critical role of protein source selection in the development of nutritionally balanced and functionally viable plant-based surimi products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.