ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: American Indian/Indigenous (AI) populations have the highest rate of ischemic heart disease (IHD) of any racial or ethnic group in the United States. While modifiable cardiovascular risk factors represent a well-established source of elevated IHD in AI, little is known regarding genetic IHD influences, in particular Methods: We performed a cross-sectional, community-based study including tribal Elders (ages >54 years) at the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa in the state of Minnesota. We collected data pertaining to demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, Findings: One-hundred-eighty-one participants were included. Their median age and interquartile range were 67 (61, 73) years, AI ancestry was 75 % (50 %, 100 %), 126 (70 %) were females, 46 (25 %) were Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.