ArticleNeurophotonics2026
HR
Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Neural activation in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals is inherently convolved with, and temporally blurred by, a hemodynamic response function (HRF). Accurately modeling HRF variability during deconvolution improves neural activity recovery. Aim: We present the Python-based HRfunc tool for estimating local HRF distributions and neural activity from fNIRS through deconvolution. HRFs are stored within a tree and a hash table hybrid data structure for efficient spatial and contextual identification of relevant HRFs. Approach: To test the HRfunc tool, we conducted two analyses with hemoglobin and estimated neural activity, a general linear model (GLM) analysis on a single subject, child executive function task ( Results: Estimated HRFs contained a generally canonical shape. Within estimated neural activity, kurtosis increased, skew remained stable, and signal-to-noise ratio decreased. Neural synchrony lateralization effects emerged, and consistent GLM outcomes were observed. Conclusions: These results support the use of the HRfunc tool for estimating event-based HRFs and neural activity in fNIRS studies. Through collective sharing of HRFs, an HRF database will be established to provide access to estimated HRFs across brain regions, subject ages, and experimental contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.