ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Artificial Intelligence-driven spatial transcriptomics in OSCC: Mapping the tumor microenvironment and personalizing therapy.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial intelligence empowered biomaterials for cancer therapy: From rational design to clinical translation.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Precision immuno-oncology in oral cancer: latest trends in biomarkers, novel drug development and nanoparticle-based therapeutic platforms.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The spatial revolution in immuno-oncology: artificial intelligence decoding NK cell niches to predict therapeutic response.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advancements in bone marrow biopsy: the role of omics and artificial intelligence in hematologic diagnostics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Aptamers and aptamer-drug conjugates as synthetic immune modulators for cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) represents a transformative approach in cancer research, offering high-resolution insights into the spatial organization of gene expression within tissues, particularly relevant for the complex tumor microenvironment (TME) of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Unlike conventional bulk RNA sequencing, which masks spatial heterogeneity, ST retains the architectural context of tumors, enabling the mapping of molecular gradients, tumor-stroma interactions, and immune cell localization. Various ST platforms-such as 10x Genomics Visium, Slide-seqV2, MERFISH, NanoString GeoMx DSP, CosMx SMI, and BGI. Stereo-seq-each offers unique advantages in resolution, sample compatibility, and transcriptome depth. Their application in OSCC has led to the identification of spatially distinct gene signatures, aiding in the stratification of tumor subtypes and uncovering novel prognostic markers. Furthermore, the integration of ST with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning has enhanced its analytical capabilities, enabling automated feature extraction, spatial clustering, and predictive modeling of disease progression. Despite these advancements, limitations such as high computational demands, limited access to fresh-frozen tissues, and platform-specific biases persist. Nonetheless, the synergy between ST and AI heralds a new era in precision pathology, with the potential to revolutionize diagnosis, risk assessment, and personalized therapeutic strategies for OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.