ArticleResearch square2025
Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Electrocardiogram Analysis for Age and Sex Classification in Youth.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Electrocardiogram (ECG) values vary significantly across age and sex, particularly during childhood and adolescence. While age- and sex-specific ECG standards exist, they often fail to capture complex multi-dimensional relationships and have not been applied in machine learning (ML) enhanced ECG analysis. Accuracy of automated ECG analysis in clinical practice improved significantly by applying ML models, however there is a paucity of such studies in the pediatric population. Our aim was to create age- and sex-specific standards for children by ML modeling. Methods: We analyzed 29,408 curated resting 12-lead ECGs from healthy subjects aged 0-21 years using 177 digitized ECG variables combined with various ML models including regression and classification analyses and semi-supervised neural networks. Primary outcome variables were age and sex. Model performance was evaluated using F1-score, AUROC, and confusion matrices across repeated train-test splits. Results: Support vector machine (SVM) achieved the highest accuracy in modeling both age and sex. Key predictive features included heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, and T-wave amplitude. Age-group classification achieved an average true positive rate of 60% with SVM, improving to 94% when allowing one-group misclassification. Sex classification reached F1-scores of 0.91 and AUROC of 0.95 in adolescents and young adults, and moderate accuracy in younger children. Discussion: Traditional supervised ML models can accurately model physiologic ECG changes related to age and sex, outperforming semi-supervised models, particularly in smaller subgroups. These findings support the development of age- and sex-specific ML-enhanced ECG standards to aid future research and clinical applications in pediatric cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.