ArticleResearch square2025
Schizophrenia Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks on EEG Data.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormal corollary discharge has been implicated in schizophrenia and manifests as reduced suppression of auditory evoked responses during self-generated sounds. We investigate whether deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on EEG from a basic button-tone task can detect schizophrenia at the single-trial/subject level. We analyzed EEG from 81 participants (schizophrenia and healthy controls; combined across a prior publication and a larger replication cohort) collected during three conditions: (1) button press generating a tone, (2) passive tone, and (3) button press without tone. Preprocessing included re-referencing to averaged earlobes, 0.1 Hz high-pass filtering, canonical correlation analysis for muscle/high-frequency noise removal, ICA artifact rejection, epoching, baseline correction, and interpolation of outlier channels/trials. We trained a 2D-CNN optimized with Adam where inputs comprised from up to 64 electrodes. On a held-out validation set, the model achieved accuracy = 0.6265 and val loss = 0.6455. From the confusion matrix, we obtained recall (schizophrenia) = 0.578, specificity = 0.640, precision = 0.308, and F1 = 0.402.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.