ArticleResearch square2025
EEG Biomarkers for a Precision-Medicine Approach to Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and debilitating psychiatric condition with significant rates of treatment resistance. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), has emerged as a promising option for individuals unresponsive to pharmacological interventions. However, a substantial proportion of patients still fail to achieve meaningful clinical improvement, underscoring the need for reliable biomarkers to predict treatment response. Electroencephalography (EEG) and TMS-EEG have been increasingly explored as promising predictive tools due to their ability to assess cortical excitability, connectivity, and neuroplasticity. The evidence gathered from 18 high-quality studies highlights the relevance of EEG and TMS-EEG biomarkers in predicting outcomes of NIBS in MDD. Resting-state EEG studies emphasize the importance of spectral power alterations, alpha asymmetry, and connectivity patterns, while TMS-EEG studies underline the role of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), particularly the N100 and N45 components, in forecasting therapeutic response. While these findings suggest significant potential, methodological variability, small sample sizes, and differing stimulation protocols limit their immediate clinical translation. However, these biomarkers provide a solid foundation for implementing precision medicine. Prior EEG or TMS-EEG assessments can play a valuable role in guiding the personalization of NIBS treatment strategies. The systematic integration of these neurophysiological biomarkers into clinical practice could maximize therapeutic efficacy and reduce non-response rates, paving the way for more precise and effective interventions in depression treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.