Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282217›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Improving Type 2 Diabetes Prediction: Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Balanced Data from the AWI-Gen Cohort.

Richmond Balinia Adda

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richmond Balinia AddaDepartment of Biometry, School of Mathematical Science, C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Science (UTAS), Navrongo, Ghana.

Funding

Shared Core: Biobanking, Bioinformatics and Data ManagementU54HG006938 · NHGRI · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI RAMSAY, MICHELE MICHELE · 2012 to 2022
$12.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006938Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an escalating public health concern across Africa, but regionally tailored predictive models are scarce. Advances in machine learning (ML) offer potential for early identification, though previous research has been constrained by methodological issues such as data leakage, class imbalance, and overfitting, limiting clinical deployment, especially in digital health contexts. Methods: This study analysed data from 2,010 participants in the H3Africa AWI-Gen cohort in northern Ghana to develop and evaluate ML-based prediction models tailored to African settings. Rigorous preprocessing steps, including handling class imbalance with SMOTE and excluding diagnostic biomarkers prone to target leakage, were applied. Eight ML classifiers underwent robust Bayesian hyperparameter optimisation. Model performance was assessed via stratified 5-fold cross-validation and confirmed through extensive sensitivity and calibration analyses. Results: The optimised XGBoost model yielded an AUC of 0.845 (95% CI: 0.812-0.878) and a sensitivity of 78.2% on unseen data. Including glucose as a predictor increased performance by 11.5%, underscoring the necessity of its exclusion to avoid biased evaluation. Models using only anthropometric and lifestyle variables (AUC = 0.783) demonstrated robust predictive capacity, with waist circumference, physical activity, and BMI standing out as the most stable predictors across analyses. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that ML models constructed from routinely collected clinical and lifestyle data can attain clinically meaningful diabetes prediction suitable for digital health applications in low-resource African contexts. This study addresses prior methodological gaps and offers a data-driven framework that is both robust and clinically plausible for early T2DM detection, with potential implications for public health policy and digital screening programmes in similar populations.

Indexed as

AfricaClinical ValidationDigital HealthMachine LearningPredictive ModellingType 2 DiabetesXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41282217
PMCPMC12637827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.