ArticleResearch square2025
Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide for the Treatment of Refractory Macular Edema Secondary to Non-Infectious Uveitis.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was recently FDA-approved and is emerging as a new alternative to other local therapies for macular edema (ME) associated with noninfectious uveitis (NIU). Methods: This was a retrospective review of our initial experience with a cohort of patients with refractory ME secondary to NIU treated with suprachoroidal TA from November 2022 to October 2023. Data collected included demographics, ophthalmic history, as well as exam and imaging findings at baseline and follow-up visits. Results: Six eyes from 5 patients with refractory ME secondary to NIU were included in the study. The cohort included 2 females (40%) and the median age was 62 years (IQR = 8). Ophthalmic diagnoses included intermediate uveitis (n = 2; 40%), birdshot chorioretinopathy (n = 1; 20%), autoimmune retinopathy (n = 1; 20%), and panuveitis (n = 1; 20%). The median logMAR visual acuity was 0.7 (Snellen 20/100) at baseline and improved to 0.3 (Snellen 20/40) during follow-up visits at 1 month and 2-3 months. The median central subfield thickness (CST) was 690 μm at baseline and improved to 367.5 μm and 309 μm at the follow-up visits at 1 month and 2-3 months, respectively. The initial improvement in logMAR visual acuity and CST was less pronounced at follow-up visits at 6-7 months and 11-12 months. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the safety of suprachoroidal TA and efficacy signals including improvement in visual acuity and ME at 3 months in patients with severe, refractory ME secondary to NIU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.