ArticleResearch square2025
Children with lower language skill engage additional brain mechanisms in both hemispheres during sentence comprehension.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-voxel pattern analysis was used to determine whether a support vector machine (SVM) could distinguish between grammatically correct sentences and sentences with a morphological violation related to tense-marking in 7-year-old children (N = 92) undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. SVM classifier accuracy was examined in regions of interest (ROIs) related to phonological processing (inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis and posterior superior temporal gyrus) and semantic processing (inferior frontal gyrus, pars triangularis and posterior middle temporal gyrus) determined with independent functional localizers using sound and meaning judgments. In these ROIs, the classifier performed around chance indicating that grammatical sentences and sentences with a morphological violation have a similar underlying representation for the whole sample. We also investigated correlations of standardized measures of language skill with classifier accuracy in the ROIs and in the whole brain. Whole brain analyses showed lower skill was associated with higher classification accuracy in bilateral brain areas implicated in semantic processing, in articulation and phonological processing and in verbal working memory. Overall, children with lower language skill seem to use widespread mechanisms in both hemispheres for sentences comprehension, possibly indicating increasing use of rehearsal mechanisms and semantic compensation for detecting morphological errors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.