ArticleResearch square2025
Analysis of the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Neuro Databank by geographic region and income status.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: While COVID-19 is more commonly known to present and persist in terms of respiratory symptoms, evidence for neurologic manifestations is limited. Objectives: This study aims to provide an epidemiological overview of neurologic manifestations of COVID-19. It compares the demographic and clinical profiles of patients based on geographic location and country income classification. Moreover, it describes the neurologic manifestations of Long COVID. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of a multi-country cohort of patients with COVID-19-associated neurologic symptoms enrolled in the COVID-19 Neuro Databank from January 2020 to February 2025. Demographic, clinical and health system-related factors were described. Comparisons among geographic regions and income classifications were performed via analysis of variance and chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests. Results: Majority of the 3,901 patients were from the United States (U.S.) and from high-income countries. The mean age was 57.27±18 years and 54% were males. Neurologic comorbidities were highest in the U.S. whereas non-neurologic comorbidities. Asia had the greatest frequency of severe COVID and mortality. Vaccination and use of COVID-19 medication was lowest in Africa. There were significant associations between COVID-19 vaccination and use of COVID-19 medications with income level. The five leading COVID-19-associated neurologic conditions were neurocognitive disorders, fatigue, headache, anosmia, and ageusia. A subset of Long COVID was identified as thought disorders, fatigue, mood disorders, stroke, headache, and neurocognitive disorders. Conclusions: This study provides insight into the varying profile and burdens of COVID-19 associated neurologic conditions and the health inequities during the pandemic among geographic and income groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.