ArticleResearch square2025
Feasibility results from a randomized trial of a text message-delivered sexual violence harm reduction intervention among college students.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: We conducted a Stage 1B pilot randomized controlled trial in which a text message was used to reduce the degree of harm caused by sexual violence. The complete study protocol was assessed to inform future intervention delivery and research processes for a full-scale trial. Methods: This feasibility randomized trial compared two text message-delivered intervention conditions: alcohol reduction content and sexual violence harm reduction content. We recruited college students aged 18-24 years who reported recent (past 30 days) binge drinking to participate in the 12-week intervention and to provide self-reported data on outcomes prior to randomization, postintervention, and 3 months after intervention completion. Results: A total of 183 college students were randomized to one of the intervention conditions and participated in the study. Two of the four feasibility measures were met (retention and missing data), whereas two underperformed their goals (proportion of messages responded to and enrollment of eligible screened individuals). As anticipated, no statistically significant outcome findings were noted, as we were underpowered for the measured outcomes. Conclusions: While the enrollment of eligible screened participants was lower than the goal, we were still able to recruit over 180 of the target 200 participants, and a 98% retention rate made up for the lower than anticipated recruitment. Data regarding the details of which text messages participants were most or least likely to engage with and why presented opportunities to refine the intervention prior to full-scale testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.