Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282161›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Large Language Models for Large-Scale, Rigorous Qualitative Analysis in Applied Health Services Research.

Sasha Ronaghi, Emma-Louise Aveling, Maria Levis, Rachel L Ross, Emily Alsentzer, Sara Singer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sasha RonaghiDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, 353 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Emma-Louise AvelingDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Maria LevisImpactivo LLC, 1606 PR-25, San Juan, PR, 00901, USA.
Rachel L RossDepartment of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Emily AlsentzerDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, 353 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Sara SingerDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, 353 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

Implementing Scalable, PAtient-centered Team-based Care for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and Health Disparities (iPATH)R01MD017870 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sara Jean Singer · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD017870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) show promise for improving the efficiency of qualitative analysis in large, multi-site health-services research. Yet methodological guidance for LLM integration into qualitative analysis and evidence of their impact on real-world research methods and outcomes remain limited. We developed a model- and task-agnostic framework for designing human-LLM qualitative analysis methods to support diverse analytic aims. Within a multi-site study of diabetes care at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), we leveraged the framework to implement human-LLM methods for (1) qualitative synthesis of researcher-generated summaries to produce comparative feedback reports and (2) deductive coding of 167 interview transcripts to refine a practice-transformation intervention. LLM assistance enabled timely feedback to practitioners and the incorporation of large-scale qualitative data to inform theory and practice changes. This work demonstrates how LLMs can be integrated into applied health-services research to enhance efficiency while preserving rigor, offering guidance for continued innovation with LLMs in qualitative research.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchHuman–AI CollaborationLarge Language ModelsQualitative Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41282161
PMCPMC12636712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.