Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282150›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Hearing loss and cognitive function among older adults in 18 high-income countries: Moderating and Mediating factors.

Xu Zong, Huaiyue Wang, Guoqi Xiao, Ye Zhang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xu ZongUniversity of Helsinki.
Huaiyue WangShanghai Normal University.
Guoqi XiaoBeijing Normal University.
Ye ZhangRenmin University of China.

Funding

Enhancing the Comparability of SHARE with HRS and ELSAR01AG052527 · NIA · MAX PLANCK INST/SOCIAL LAW/SOCIAL POLICY · PI BOERSCH-SUPAN, AXEL H · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS HHSN271201300071CNIA NIH HHS R01 AG052527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss is a major, potentially modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment, but its moderating and mediating factors remain underexplored in cross-national settings. Methods: We used the data from a cross-national survey, the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). 38,506 participants aged 65 and above across 17 European countries and Israel from SHARE wave 6 were included. The study applied the Double Machine Learning (DML) approach to evaluate the association of hearing aid use with cognitive function in older adults, and to test demographic moderators and psychosocial mediators. Results: Hearing loss was significantly associated with poorer cognitive performance in temporal orientation (coefficient = -0.061; 95% CI: [-0.076, -0.045]), memory (-0.448; 95% CI: -0.520, -0.375]), numeracy (-0.061; 95% CI: [-0.092, -0.030]), and verbal fluency (-0.379; 95% CI: [-0.529, -0.229]). The associations varied by gender, education and age group, such as stronger associations with verbal fluency of women, and memory of higher educated individuals. Mediation analyses indicated that the negative associations of hearing loss with cognitive function may be partially explained by increased feelings of isolation, loneliness and depression. Conclusion: This study highlights the cognitive burden of hearing loss in later life and underscores the importance of early detection and intervention. Addressing psychosocial consequences of hearing impairment may help mitigate its impact on cognitive health. Further longitudinal research is needed to validate these findings and clarify causal pathways.

Indexed as

Cognitive healthcross-national analysisHearing lossMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41282150
PMCPMC12636726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.