ArticleResearch square2025
Single base focal hypermutation cooccurs with structural variation as an early event in advanced prostate tumourigenesis with ancestry specific independence: a multi-ancestral observational study.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Kataegis, the focal hypermutation of single base positions in tumour genomes, has received little attention with regards to prostate cancer (PCa) molecular features, tumour evolution and associated clinical presentation. Most notably, the impact of this phenomenon is yet to be explored across ancestral lineages representing the extremities of PCa presentation and outcomes, with men of African ancestry disproportionately disadvantaged. The purpose of this study is to address the knowledge gap through African inclusive multi-ancestral interrogation. Methods: We assessed for ancestrally shared and unique molecular, evolutionary and clinical features of kataegis in 669 multi-ancestral whole PCa genomes. Access to raw whole-genome sequenced data allowed for direct single-pipeline comparative analysis between 109 southern African and 57 European derived treatment naïve high-risk-biased primary tumours (74% and 88%) with paired blood samples, further assessed against publicly available 207 Asian high-risk-leaning comparative (65%) and 296 European low-risk-biased alternative (79%) resources. Comparisons between ancestries and risk groups were through Wilcoxon's rank sum test and Fisher's exact tests, with Results: Confirming relatively low burdens, we found kataegis to be significantly associated with genomic instability, cancer drivers, and clinical adversity across ancestries (false discovery rate = 7 × 10 Conclusions: We found kataegis-positivity to be associated with poor PCa presentation and prognosis, irrespective of patient ancestry. Kataegis-related genomic instability occurring early and late during African derived tumourigenesis, may partly explain the heightened tumour and clinical heterogeneity observed for patients of African ancestry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.