ArticleResearch square2025
Digital Clock Assessment in South Asian Setting: Pilot study.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As cognitive impairment becomes a growing burden in low- and middle-income countries, scalable tools for early detection are urgently needed. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and performance of a tablet-based digital Clock Drawing Test (DCTclock) among 303 adults aged 50 years and older from the population-based CARRS cohort in urban India. Participants completed both the tablet-based DCTclock and the paper-based Mini-Cog, which was used to classify cognitive status (≤ 2 vs. ≥3). DCTclock administration required less than four minutes, and 99.3% of tests yielded analyzable outputs. Compared with cognitively unimpaired participants (n = 252), those classified as impaired (n = 51) scored significantly lower on the DCTclock total score and subdomains, particularly spatial reasoning and information processing. Performance was lower with older age and lower educational attainment (both p < 0.001) but did not differ by sex. The DCTclock demonstrated moderate discriminative accuracy for Mini-Cog-defined impairment (AUC = 0.669), and each interquartile range higher total score was associated with 52% lower odds of impairment (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.70). Using established FDA thresholds, participants scoring below 60 had 3.35-fold greater odds of impairment compared with those scoring 75 or higher, and those scoring 60-74 had 1.93-fold increased odds. In sensitivity analyses, the ROC-derived Youden cut point of 38 identified impaired participants with 3.95-fold greater odds of Mini-Cog impairment. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and potential utility of digital clock drawing for cognitive screening in diverse, resource-limited settings, supporting its broader application in aging surveillance and dementia risk stratification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.