ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Pathways and challenges in the clinical translational of radiopharmaceuticals for pediatric investigations.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise as a Programmable Regulator of Mitophagy Sensitivity in Aging Muscle and Age-Related Disease.IUBMB life · 2026Review
- Specific PET Imaging for Precision Management of Lung Cancer: Advances, Clinical Translation and Future Directions.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical development and clinical translation face numerous scientific, ethical, and regulatory challenges, particularly within the pediatric population. Although molecular imaging holds significant promise for improving diagnosis and treatment across a spectrum of diseases, including pediatric-specific conditions like Kawasaki disease, autism spectrum disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and neuroblastoma, the path from discovery to clinical application remains problematic. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides three primary pathways-traditional Investigational New Drug (IND) applications, exploratory Investigational New Drug application (eIND), and the Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC) mechanism-to facilitate clinical translation of radiotracers. However, these frameworks are not specifically tailored to pediatric needs. Children's heightened sensitivity to ionizing radiation, coupled with physiological variability and ethical concerns, complicates trial design, dosimetry, and informed consent. Current practices also exhibit the limitation of inconsistent dosing standards across institutions. Emerging technologies-including improved single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography techniques, theranostics, whole-body scanners, and artificial intelligence-driven radiomics-offer potential to reduce these risks by enabling lower doses, reduced scan time, and more precise targeting. Nonetheless, a significant gap remains in translating these innovations into safe, equitable access for pediatric patients. Addressing these challenges requires updated regulatory guidance, ethical frameworks, and robust clinical strategies to ensure equitable access to molecular imaging innovations for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.