Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282030›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Prakriti (constitutional typology) in Ayurveda: a critical review of Prakriti assessment tools and their scientific validity.

Archana Venkatesh, Lina Johansson, Prabu Vignesh Sivanandan, Shiva Pratap Gopakumar, Karthik Sankaranarayanan, Christian S Kessler, Shraddha Ravani, Rammanohar Puthiyedath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A scoping review of clinicalFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Implementation and evaluation of an integrated ayurveda-yoga education program for lifestyle modifications among people with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Decoding of Human Behaviour and Personality.Annals of neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Archana VenkateshAmrita School of Ayurveda, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, India.
Lina JohanssonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Prabu Vignesh SivanandanNetcracker Technology, Bengaluru, India.
Shiva Pratap GopakumarAmrita School of Sustainable Futures, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, India.
Karthik SankaranarayananAmrita School of Sustainable Futures, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, India.
Christian S KesslerCharité Competence Center for Traditional and Integrative Medicine (CCCTIM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Shraddha RavaniDepartment of Physiology and Health Maharishi International University, Fairfield, IA, United States.
Rammanohar PuthiyedathAmrita School of Ayurveda, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prakriti or constitutional typology is the foundation of personalized health care in Ayurveda. Traditionally, Ayurvedic clinicians have assessed Prakriti in a primarily experience-based and often subjective manner. However, in the past few decades attempts to develop objective tools have been made by researchers from multidisciplinary domains. This review aimed to identify existing Ayurvedic Prakriti assessment tools and evaluate their scientific rigor. Methods: Aligned with the SANRA framework, our narrative review incorporated systematic elements. A Boolean search in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane in November 2024 using ("Prakriti") AND ("Ayurveda" OR "Ayurvedic") yielded 635 articles, together with 12 additional articles from citations search. Ninety four studies met the inclusion criteria. Prakriti assessment tools were quantified and evaluated using Scale Development and Validation Framework by Boateng et al., alongside custom set of study quality indicators to assess their methodological rigor. Results: Between 1987 and 2024, 64 unique Prakriti assessment tools (PATs) were identified, each using one or more methods to perform data collection and decision-making tasks. Variations in the selection and application of these methods resulted in the development of diverse methodological frameworks for Prakriti assessment. Of the 64 PATs identified, only 20 PATs underwent any form of validation and among them, just two PATs, the CCRAS-PAS software and ACPI scale met seven of the nine recommended criteria. Most tools lacked dimensionality testing, test-retest reliability, contextual validity and were not tested across diverse populations, indicating a high risk of developer-bias. Additionally, 32 categories of measurable correlates to Prakriti have been studied across 94 studies, but only five of them were studied using validated tools. Conclusion: Much progress has been made in developing methodology and integrating technology for creating Prakriti assessment tools along with attempts to identifying measurable correlates to Prakriti that could potentially serve as Prakriti biomarkers. Currently no tool fully meets the evaluation criteria of the Scale Development and Validation framework, except CCRAS-PAS and ACPI that show partial readiness and can be refined. Further work is needed to establish Prakriti as a clinically validated measurable construct and to integrate Ayurveda into the domain of personalized health care.

Indexed as

Ayurvedabody constitutional typologymeasurable correlatespersonalized health carePrakrititechnology integration

Identifiers

PMID41282030
PMCPMC12631390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.