Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282004›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Application of predonation hydration for vasovagal reactions during blood donation: a bibliometric analysis (2004-2023).

Cong Wang, Li Chen, Xiaomin Niu, Wenwen Shi, Xiaojing Liu, Meilin Li, Lihua Li, Wence Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cong WangHebei Province Blood Center, Blood Security Department, Shijiazhuang, China.
Li ChenHebei Province Blood Center, Blood Security Department, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaomin NiuHebei Province Blood Center, Blood Security Department, Shijiazhuang, China.
Wenwen ShiHebei Province Blood Center, Blood Security Department, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaojing LiuHebei Province Blood Center, Blood Security Department, Shijiazhuang, China.
Meilin LiBeijing Tongzhou Central Blood Station, Blood Security Department, Beijing, China.
Lihua LiHebei Province Blood Center, Blood Security Department, Shijiazhuang, China.
Wence LiHebei Province Blood Center, Blood Security Department, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vasovagal reaction (VVR) is one of the prevalent adverse reactions encountered during voluntary blood donation, posing a risk to subsequent donations by the same individuals. Here, we present a bibliometric study aimed at mitigating VVRs. Methods: This study retrieved pertinent publications on the correlation between predonation hydration and vasovagal reactions from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database from 2004 to 2023. Bibliometric analysis was conducted employing bibliometrix R, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Results: This study encompassed 241 papers across 31 countries and 387 research institutions. Notably, the University of Bucharest (Romania, Conclusion: This marks the first comprehensive overview of bibliometric research aimed at understanding the preventive and mitigative effects of predonation hydration on VVR. Predonation hydration as a strategy to prevent or alleviate VVR is currently the focal point of research interest. Our findings suggest that predonation hydration is a promising, low-cost approach to enhance donor safety and retention, although standardization of protocols is needed.

Indexed as

bibliometrixCiteSpacepredonation hydrationvoluntary blood donationVOSviewerVVR

Identifiers

PMID41282004
PMCPMC12631644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.