ReviewBurns & trauma2025
Clinical practice guideline for pediatric scar prevention and treatment (2025 edition).
Review in Burns & trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cosmetic outcomes of postoperative scar taping after surgical incisions: A systematic review.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Custom-made cervical orthosis for pediatric neck scar contracture: a self-controlled case series.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk assessment model for post-surgical scar formation in pediatric melanocytic nevus excision: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children constitute a key population for scar prevention and treatment because of the unique features of their skin's physiological structure and psychosomatic growth. Currently, most approaches to pediatric scar management are formulated with reference to adult-related consensuses and guidelines, which fail to fully account for the specific characteristics of pediatric scars and their distinct needs in relation to growth and development. As a result, there are controversies regarding specific prevention and treatment strategies. To address this limitation, the Chinese Burn Association brought together domestic and international experts from disciplines relevant to the field of scar prevention and treatment. Guided by evidence-based medical evidence, drawing on domestic and international literature, and integrating the clinical experience of specialist physicians, the branch first conducted consultations on clinical issues and then organized multiple rounds of expert meetings for discussions. Eventually, the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.