ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Single-row Rotator Cuff Repair Using the PENN Shoulder Score - A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and disability. Arthroscopic repair is the preferred surgical approach for symptomatic full-thickness tears that fail conservative management. Single-row and double-row techniques are widely used, but clinical outcomes for small-to-medium tears are often comparable. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes following arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair using the Penn shoulder score (PSS). Materials and Methods: Thirty patients (aged 18-60 years) with small-to-medium full-thickness rotator cuff tears, unresponsive to at least 6 months of non-operative management, underwent arthroscopic single-row repair with bioabsorbable suture anchors. Patients were evaluated using the PSS preoperatively and at follow-up visits at 2, 6, 10, 24 weeks, and final review (~12 months). The PSS evaluates pain, function, and patient satisfaction on a 100-point scale. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The cohort had a mean age of 38.9 years; 70% were male. All tears were either small or medium per Cofield's classification. The mean PSS improved from 30.4 ± 3.9 preoperatively to 98.4 ± 3.8 at final follow-up (P < 0.001), with significant gains at each interval. At 1 year, 93.3% achieved an "Excellent" outcome, and all patients were satisfied with their results. No re-tears or major complications were reported. Conclusion: Arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair provides excellent functional outcomes and high patient satisfaction for small-to-medium tears. The technique is cost-effective and safe, making it especially suitable for resource-constrained settings like India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.