ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Locking Plate Fixators for Infected Extra-articular Long Bone Fractures without Bone Loss.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Management of infected extra-articular long bone fractures without bone loss remains a challenging orthopedic problem. Traditional methods involving external fixators can be associated with discomfort, pin site infections, and delayed union. Supercutaneous plating using metaphyseal locking plates offers a promising alternative. To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of locking plate fixators as a definitive treatment for infected extra-articular tibial and femoral fractures without bone loss. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 15 patients treated between February 2018 and November 2019 at a tertiary care center. Inclusion criteria were extra-articular fractures without bone loss or intra-articular extension, and adequate wound management feasibility. All patients underwent thorough debridement and fixation using metaphyseal locking plates as external fixators following external fixator principles. Antibiotics were tailored based on intraoperative cultures and administered for 6 weeks. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically for fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome using the Knee Society score. Results: Of the 15 patients, 4 had distal femur fractures and 11 had tibial fractures. The mean follow-up was 9 months. Average union time was 8 months for femur and 3.9 months for tibia fractures. Two patients required autologous iliac crest bone grafting. Functional outcomes were excellent in 4 patients (26.6%), good in 7 (46.6%), fair in 3 (20%), and poor in 1 (6.7%), with all suboptimal outcomes noted in femur fractures. Six patients experienced screw tract infections, and one had a refracture following premature plate removal. No implant failure or loosening was observed. Conclusion: Metaphyseal locking plate fixators can be effectively used as a definitive fixation method for infected extra-articular fractures without bone loss. The technique provides stable fixation, acceptable infection control, and promotes union with good patient compliance. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these promising outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.