Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281774›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025

Cost reduction and quality preservation with digital scanner interfaces for optical coherence tomography.

Kyoungmo Koo, Lucia Lee, Morgan McCloud, Mark Draelos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyoungmo KooUniversity of Michigan, Department of Robotics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1276-7574
Lucia LeeUniversity of Michigan, Department of Robotics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Morgan McCloudDuke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-2261
Mark DraelosUniversity of Michigan, Department of Robotics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5051-0880

Funding

Medical Scientist Training Program Training GrantT32GM145449 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher D Kontos · 2022 to 2026
$6.6M
Robotic Point-of-Care OCTR00EY034200 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DRAELOS, MARK · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY034200NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems are traditionally decomposed into engine and scanner components with an expensive and noise-prone analog interface to communicate the scan pattern between the two. Although simple and convenient, analog signals are susceptible to interference and require expensive hardware to generate with appropriate precision for OCT. Aim: To overcome these limitations, we implemented a digital interface for our OCT system using low-cost embedded microprocessors and custom PC software, exploiting recent trends toward digital servo drivers for optical scanning. Approach: Our interface features USB interfacing with a PC for scan pattern download and position feedback upload, 50-kHz communication rate, external triggers with adjustable downsampling, and no external power requirements. Results: We quantitatively assessed the latency, noise characteristics, and imaging performance of our digital interface in comparison with a conventional analog system that is an order of magnitude more expensive. The signal analysis confirmed that the digital interface reliably transmitted the intended scan pattern to the galvanometer driver and significantly reduced noise in the position feedback signal. High-speed laser trajectory tracking during sparse raster scanning revealed that discrepancies in the analog feedback signal did not reflect actual galvanometer positioning errors; both interfaces achieved equivalent spatial accuracy. Resolution testing demonstrated that both interfaces produced comparable OCT image quality, with no discernible difference up to the system's resolution limit, whereas reconstruction based on digital interface position feedback outperformed other methods when demanding scan patterns, such as spiral scanning, were applied. To support reproducibility and system integration, we developed a custom printed circuit board (PCB), enabling a compact and robust configuration for future OCT deployments. A simplified version of the firmware is supported by our open-source library Conclusions: Together, these results demonstrate quantitative and qualitative equivalence of the interfaces, despite an order of magnitude reduction in cost. We released open-source software, PCB schematics, design files, and a bill of materials so that the OCT community can benefit from these improvements and cost savings.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, Optical CoherenceEquipment DesignHumansReproducibility of ResultsSoftwaredigital controlembedded systemsgalvanometerslaseroptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID41281774
PMCPMC12638214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.