ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Impact of Increased Use of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies on COPD Exacerbation Rates, Mortality, and Total Costs: PROMETHEUS France.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, 52 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3-arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, All Administered Once-daily in the Morning Via a Dry Powder Inhaler in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Parallel-Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PT010 Relative to PT003 and PT009 on COPD Exacerbations Over a 52-Week Treatment Period in Subjects With Moderate to Very Severe COPD (Ethos)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Statins for the prevention of exacerbations in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: COPD is the seventh-leading cause of death in France. The randomized controlled trials ETHOS (NCT02465567) and IMPACT (NCT02164513) have demonstrated a reduction in exacerbations (primary endpoint) and suggest a decrease in mortality (secondary endpoint) with single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT)-containing a long-acting beta-2 agonist, long-acting anticholinergics, and an inhaled corticosteroid-in patients with COPD. No study has evaluated the potential impact of increased SITT use in France. Objective: To evaluate the impact of increased SITT use in COPD on exacerbations, mortality, and medical costs in France. Methods: A stochastic model was constructed using GOLD therapeutic recommendations and literature data on patient characteristics, prevalence, incidence, treatment distribution, COPD severity and treatment changes, mortality, and exacerbations to model the French COPD population. Two scenarios were studied: Status Quo (no increase in SITT use) and Increased SITT, using the GOLD stage and exacerbation history to initiate SITT treatment in modeled patients, considering the annual probabilities of transitioning from one GOLD stage to another over a 10-year period. Results: Increased SITT use compared to the Status Quo over a 10-year period could reduce severe and moderate exacerbations by 8.0% and 9.2%, respectively, all-cause mortality by 8.5%, and medical costs by 875 million euros (excluding additional SITT costs), and extend the life of patients by 0.6 years per patient with COPD. Conclusion: The model shows that increased SITT use in France, in line with recent recommendations, could be associated with a reduction in exacerbation rates, mortality, and costs in patients with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.