Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281709›Full record

Articlei-Perception

Selective suprasecond timing deficit in social media addicts: Bisection task reveals overestimation and impaired sensitivity without subsecond effects.

Hongyu Zhou, Qingqing Li, Yuanyuan Tang, Yu Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongyu ZhouSichuan Normal University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6665-722X
Qingqing LiKey Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-9081
Yuanyuan TangSichuan Normal University, China.
Yu TianSichuan Normal University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6541-9775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of social media has raised concerns about its addictive potential and impairments in mental health and cognitive functions, including distortions in time processing. Emerging evidence suggests social media addicts tend to misestimate the amount of time spent using social media, hinting at possible problems with their cognitive time-processing. This study aimed to investigate the impact of social media addiction on basic time perception using controlled experimental paradigms. Forty participants scoring ≥24 on the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale with ≥5 hr daily usage were recruited, alongside 40 controls. After excluding individuals craving, fear of missing out for social media, or test anxiety during experiment, final samples included 36 addicts and 37 controls. Time reproduction (motor timing) and bisection (perceptual timing) tasks were administered, distinguishing subsecond (<1 s) and suprasecond (>1 s) intervals. Tasks used neutral gray stimuli to avoid social media cues and included pretask rest to control physiological arousal. Social media addicts exhibited significant deficits in suprasecond bisection task, demonstrated by lower subjective equality points (1,430.69 vs. 1,549.32 ms) and higher Weber ratios (0.41 vs. 0.29), indicating both time overestimation and reduced time sensitivity. No significant group differences were observed in reproduction tasks or in subsecond bisection task. These findings establish that social media addiction selectively impairs suprasecond perceptual timing, characterized by overestimation and diminished sensitivity. These findings establish a novel cognitive deficit linked to addictive social media use, with potential clinical implications for intervention strategies targeting distorted time processing.

Indexed as

social media addictiontime bisectiontime perceptiontime reproductiontiming

Identifiers

PMID41281709
PMCPMC12639200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.