ArticleContemporary clinical dentistry
Intracanal Medicaments Compromise Fiber Post Adhesion: Influence of Irrigation Techniques.
Article in Contemporary clinical dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the effect of intracanal medicaments and final irrigation techniques on resin cement penetration and the push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Methodology: Ninety extracted mandibular premolars were allocated into three groups: no medicament (control), calcium hydroxide (CH), and triple antibiotic paste (TAP). CH and TAP groups were then subdivided based on final irrigation techniques: Conventional needle irrigation (CNI), sonic irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, and XP-endo Finisher (XPF). Fiber posts were cemented with RelyX™ U200 resin cement. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to evaluate cement penetration, and push-out bond strength was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA ( Results: Compared to the control, both CH and TAP significantly decreased cement penetration and bond strength. XPF significantly enhanced these outcomes in CH-medicated canals. In TAP groups, all activation protocols improved adhesion results over CNI; however, the values remained significantly lower than those of the control. A significant interaction between medicament and irrigation protocol was observed only for maximum penetration depth. Conclusion: Intracanal medicaments adversely affect fiber post bonding. Activated irrigation technique, notably with XPF, enhances bonding, especially following CH treatment. Bonding outcomes in TAP-treated canals remained inferior despite the use of activation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.