ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
Thermo-responsive shape memory biomaterials with structural and physical adaptivity for scarless personalized nerve repair.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart-responsive electrospun scaffolds (SRES) for neural repair: Recent advances and future prospects.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Balancing topographical guidance and spatial capacity: Optimized spatial density of micropatterned filaments for enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- From blueprint to build: Metal ions in peripheral nerve development and engineering regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Engineering Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Neural Repair.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- An implantable mechano-electro cascade platform synchronizes neuro-muscle repair.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The cutting-edge advancements in biomaterials under the guidance of intelligence and bionics.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) have emerged as promising alternatives to autologous nerve grafts for peripheral nerve repair, overcoming donor site morbidity while promoting axonal regeneration. However, size and structure mismatch in conventional NGCs impairs axon sprouting, remyelination and neural regeneration efficacy. Here, we engineered a thermo-responsive self-rolling multichannel NGC comprising shape-memory poly (lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) (PLMC), silk fibroin (SF), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to enable scarless regeneration with personalized anatomical matching. The electrospun PLMC/SF-rGO conduit features axially aligned inner fibers providing topographical guidance cues for directional guidance and exhibits programmable shape recovery, enabling intraoperative customization and shape resistance throughout the nerve regeneration period. In vitro, 0.5 % rGO optimally enhanced Schwann cell migration, proliferation and neuronal proliferation. In vivo assessment in rat 10-mm sciatic defects over 12 weeks demonstrated that PLMC/SF-rGO NGCs significantly outperformed PLMC/SF controls in functional recovery, reduced muscle atrophy, and decreased fibrosis. Histology further confirmed superior axonal regeneration and marker expression (NF200/S100β), achieving outcomes comparable to autografts. This multichannel NGC synergizes structural and physical adaptability, electrical conductivity, and bioactive cues to accelerate nerve regeneration, offering a promising alternative to autografts for scarless personalized repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.