ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025
Managing gender diversity and barriers to inclusion: lived experiences of women employees in a South African coal mining company.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the context of growing global commitments to workplace diversity and inclusion, South Africa's mining sector remains a site of persistent gender inequality. Despite policy frameworks informed by liberal feminist ideals that emphasize equal rights, representation, and opportunity, women continue to experience structural and cultural barriers that hinder their advancement. This study addresses the urgent need for context-sensitive, experience-based approaches to understanding gender inequality in male-dominated industries. Methods: A qualitative, interpretive phenomenological approach was employed to explore the lived experiences of 12 purposively selected women working in various departments at a coal mining company in Mpumalanga. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to capture how these women navigate hostile workplace environments characterized by sexual harassment, gender stereotyping, unsafe working conditions, and limited access to leadership pathways. Thematic analysis was then applied using Braun and Clarke's six-step framework to identify and interpret patterns across data. Results: The findings revealed persistent structural and cultural barriers that undermine formal diversity initiatives. Participants' narratives emphasized issues of limited career advancement, biased recruitment practices, exclusionary workplace cultures, safety risks, and difficulties balancing work and family responsibilities. While liberal feminist-informed policies such as the Employment Equity Act and Women in Mining initiatives have formalized inclusion, entrenched patriarchal norms often render such reforms symbolic rather than substantive. Discussion: These findings highlight the limitations of surface-level reforms and underscore the need for deeper institutional change. Meaningful gender diversity can enhance collaboration, innovation, and workplace morale, but these benefits remain unrealised without stronger policy enforcement, inclusive organizational cultures, mentorship, gender-sensitive recruitment, safe reporting mechanisms, and targeted support for women's professional development. This research provides practical guidance for re-evaluating current diversity strategies and calls for a shift from symbolic inclusion to structural transformation within South Africa's mining industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.