ArticleBlood neoplasia2025
Predicting secondary myeloid neoplasms in acquired aplastic anemia using machine learning models.
Article in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) face up to a 20% long-term risk of developing secondary myeloid neoplasms (sMNs), including acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative and prevents sMNs, older patients and those lacking suitable donors have historically received IST as first-line therapy. Recent improvements in HSCT outcomes have expanded transplant eligibility, highlighting the need for tools to better identify patients at high risk for sMN. Validated predictive models could help guide early HSCT consideration or tailor surveillance strategies. We developed 2 binary machine learning models to predict sMN development in patients with acquired AA at clinically relevant time points: diagnosis (model 1) and 6 months after IST response (model 2). We analyzed data from 275 adult patients with AA treated at University of Texas Southwestern, Cleveland Clinic, and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 1975 and 2023. Seventy-nine clinical variables were collected, including demographics, somatic mutations, and treatment response. Neural networks were trained with leave-1-out crossvalidation. Both models achieved strong performance (area under the curve, 0.82; sensitivity, 0.82, specificity, 0.73). Shared key predictors included
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.